User talk:Kznf

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 23:33, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)

Tunch Ilkin

You were right on the spot on the spelling of his name. Even though he has been in America since he was a baby, there are a few Wikipedia editors bound and determined not to follow the rules of our Wikipedia:Naming conventions and to eliminate as much use of the English language as they can from the English Wikipedia. They run around moving articles like this to improper spellings. If it gets moved back to the non-English spelling again, I'd appreciate your support in getting it back where it belongs. Gene Nygaard 02:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Kznf! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 23:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Grey snapper.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Grey snapper.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:08, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UU "Official Logo"

You replaced the logo on the Unitarian-Universalist page with a logo which I as a UU find more familiar. The question I have for you is on what basis did you label it the offical logo. Do we have an "official logo" or is the flaming chalice open to multiple interpretations. Richard Dates 14:29, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The UUA has an official "corporate" logo.[1] That said, all I was doing yesterday (I thought) was replacing one image with another image that looked identical but which was a different image format (SVG) Charles (Kznf) 14:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:UUA Logo.svg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:UUA Logo.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reply here: Image_talk:UUA_Logo.svg

AfD nomination of Internets

An article that you have been involved in editing, Internets, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internets. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 02:31, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hollow moon illustration

Where did that illustration of the internal structure of the moon come from? That might be good to put in the caption, to show how legitimate it is, since this is an article about non-legitimate theories of moon structure. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 00:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Madison farmers market

I noticed you added a picture of the Dane County Farmers' Market to the farmers market page. I'm also from Madison and have been doing some work on that page. Without being too critical, I'm wondering if you maybe have a picture that has more people in it? It looks like you were trying to highlight the people at the market as well as the Capitol building, but the Capitol takes up about 5 times as much space. For the page on farmers markets, there should be a better balance between the building and the actual market. It looked like a perfect day for the market though. Hopefully it'll get that nice sometime soon! Uwmad (talk) 01:30, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cleveland Browns

Hello. I am addressing your point about the Browns and the AAFC.

The general consensus of pro football historians is that the Browns' domination of the AAFC was possibly the single biggest reason why the AAFC failed, certainly one of the biggest reasons. The reason why I cited four sources to support this is to reflect that this is a consensus, not a single writer opining.

The decline and fall of the AAFC is addressed in the main article on the AAFC. I created the article on the AAFC playoffs about two years ago to move some material (such as the box scores) out of the main article, which was getting long. You are quite correct that an explanation of this would be helpful, however I think the playoff article should stay focused on the playoffs, and that the reader should be referred to the main article for discussion of other AAFC-related issues.

In any case, it is good to see interest in this fascinating league, which is largely forgotten because pro football's television-aided rise was yet to come.Clubiguana (talk) 05:19, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]